03-05-2024, 02:49 PM
I have to say that I'm not a fan of backwards compatibility, but it's a way to have just one scm file for two versions... and avoid unnecessary error reporting.
For many, writing V3 (or 299 in my case) is not clear enough... but there is no solution, surely someone will want to put the files for Gimp 2.8 in 3.0.
Thanks again for the links to the development resources.
For many, writing V3 (or 299 in my case) is not clear enough... but there is no solution, surely someone will want to put the files for Gimp 2.8 in 3.0.
Thanks again for the links to the development resources.