10-11-2024, 11:32 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-11-2024, 11:43 AM by rich2005.
Edit Reason: typo
)
Trying to keep out of this but my euros worth and one problem is...
quote...I say to those people, spend 24 years on PS and then tell me what it's missing. You represent one side of the coin and the respondents represent the other side.
quote...there are other ways of doing things but not as efficient.. Are they really, not if you spend 24 years using Gimp and understand the work flow.
quote...If GIMP is so much better than PS, then explain why 99 percent of professional studios don't use it?
A friend is a lecturer (archaeology) at a local university. Adobe (and Microsoft) give them and the students free/reduced rate software. Any papers for publication have to be in Word / PS / Illustrator stipulated by University. So that 99% is just a culture, it could just as easily be LibreOffice / Gimp / Inkscape.
Really not interested in A is better than B. Gimp is just a tool much the same as a hand saw, some cut by pushing, some cut by pulling. The end result is the same.
(I actually opened a CMYK image in PS7 (linux using WINE) yesterday to check a Gimp3 export that looked odd in an image viewer. Not a nice experience but then I gave up PS 20 years ago
)
Edit: Looking at your other post, really I think you would be better off on Reddit, more your style I think.
quote...I say to those people, spend 24 years on PS and then tell me what it's missing. You represent one side of the coin and the respondents represent the other side.
quote...there are other ways of doing things but not as efficient.. Are they really, not if you spend 24 years using Gimp and understand the work flow.
quote...If GIMP is so much better than PS, then explain why 99 percent of professional studios don't use it?
A friend is a lecturer (archaeology) at a local university. Adobe (and Microsoft) give them and the students free/reduced rate software. Any papers for publication have to be in Word / PS / Illustrator stipulated by University. So that 99% is just a culture, it could just as easily be LibreOffice / Gimp / Inkscape.
Really not interested in A is better than B. Gimp is just a tool much the same as a hand saw, some cut by pushing, some cut by pulling. The end result is the same.
(I actually opened a CMYK image in PS7 (linux using WINE) yesterday to check a Gimp3 export that looked odd in an image viewer. Not a nice experience but then I gave up PS 20 years ago
)Edit: Looking at your other post, really I think you would be better off on Reddit, more your style I think.
