09-03-2017, 09:35 PM
rich2005 What an amazing tutorial, thank you so much. (Do I detect a very slight Welsh accent? ) Questions:
Using the method of assigning keyboard shortcuts. If I check the Save keyboard shortcuts on exit I guess that will change them for good, but if I don't I have to redo them next time, don't I?
Is there another way of automating workflows, like recording scripts or something like that? (Well, I'm sure there is, but the question is really: Is it too complicated for a beginner like I?)
And my scanner is Mustek ScanExpress A3 Flatbed. It was quite cheap when I bought in in 2011 and I must say very price worthy. It would be next to impossible to scan a thick magazine with sheet-feed scanner, I think.
Ofnuts Wow, I didn't choose my username for no reason and yet you managed to explain it in a way so that even I got the gist of it. I won't pretend to actually understand the inner workings of but your example was so clearcut I might be able to use it for this particular set of scans that in many cases share the same characteristics.
I do understand that to get the best possible result for each page you need to treat them individually but perhaps finding an "average" case that gets a good result it would be possible to automate the procedure. It is of course a matter of finding a balance in quality vs. time spent when it's a matter of 2000-2500 pages.
Using the method of assigning keyboard shortcuts. If I check the Save keyboard shortcuts on exit I guess that will change them for good, but if I don't I have to redo them next time, don't I?
Is there another way of automating workflows, like recording scripts or something like that? (Well, I'm sure there is, but the question is really: Is it too complicated for a beginner like I?)
And my scanner is Mustek ScanExpress A3 Flatbed. It was quite cheap when I bought in in 2011 and I must say very price worthy. It would be next to impossible to scan a thick magazine with sheet-feed scanner, I think.
Ofnuts Wow, I didn't choose my username for no reason and yet you managed to explain it in a way so that even I got the gist of it. I won't pretend to actually understand the inner workings of but your example was so clearcut I might be able to use it for this particular set of scans that in many cases share the same characteristics.
I do understand that to get the best possible result for each page you need to treat them individually but perhaps finding an "average" case that gets a good result it would be possible to automate the procedure. It is of course a matter of finding a balance in quality vs. time spent when it's a matter of 2000-2500 pages.