04-04-2020, 02:36 AM
rich2005 thank so much for your reply. 
That video was really helpful, and now I understand the clipboard mask too! Definitely a viable solution to this issue.
Actually I have learnt a lot about what is going on under the hood so to speak by grappling with this issue so thanks again for your all your input.
I just realised that the black colour of the artefacts is coming from the base colour of the colour channels which is black but not visible since I had my images all transparent. If I flood the canvas with red, make the image transparent, then draw the number in red and copy that as a brush the issue is effectively fixed since the artefacts now would be sampled in the same colour and practically imperceptible.
The very small niggling issue that remains is why Gimp is so random in its sampling of the brush creating the small randomisations on the edge in the first placee. I would have thought that when the brush size is set Gimp would sample the brush to memory and use exactly the pixel data from that sample every time and therefore produce identical results every time when using mholder's suggestion earlier in the thread on snapping to grid with 1x1 cell size so effectively snapping to pixel.
I'm going to have a think about it and possibly create a report about it in the future. Cheers!
That video was really helpful, and now I understand the clipboard mask too! Definitely a viable solution to this issue.
Actually I have learnt a lot about what is going on under the hood so to speak by grappling with this issue so thanks again for your all your input.
I just realised that the black colour of the artefacts is coming from the base colour of the colour channels which is black but not visible since I had my images all transparent. If I flood the canvas with red, make the image transparent, then draw the number in red and copy that as a brush the issue is effectively fixed since the artefacts now would be sampled in the same colour and practically imperceptible.
The very small niggling issue that remains is why Gimp is so random in its sampling of the brush creating the small randomisations on the edge in the first placee. I would have thought that when the brush size is set Gimp would sample the brush to memory and use exactly the pixel data from that sample every time and therefore produce identical results every time when using mholder's suggestion earlier in the thread on snapping to grid with 1x1 cell size so effectively snapping to pixel.
I'm going to have a think about it and possibly create a report about it in the future. Cheers!