Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
High Pass filtering 2.8 vs. 2.10
#9
(10-15-2019, 04:38 PM)Espermaschine Wrote: I cant answer any of that.

For what i do with Gimp, having so many options for doing something simple as desaturating or inverting is not an improvement.
Maybe it has a lot of relevance for people who edit photos.

I like a High Pass filter because its non destructive. In 2.8 this requires to apply the blur factor by gut feeling.
Theoretically 2.10 gives me more control/convenience with its live Blur filter (when doing it the manual way).

I guess i will have to stick with the GEGL High Pass, then.

There is also the "freaky details" method.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: High Pass filtering 2.8 vs. 2.10 - by Ofnuts - 10-15-2019, 04:13 PM
RE: High Pass filtering 2.8 vs. 2.10 - by Ofnuts - 10-15-2019, 10:00 PM
RE: High Pass filtering 2.8 vs. 2.10 - by tmanni - 04-24-2020, 06:17 PM

Forum Jump: