12-08-2020, 10:41 PM
(06-21-2018, 11:25 PM)Ofnuts Wrote: No, you can't add back Sinc/Lanczos (unless you are a pretty good C programmer). But developpers have discussed the merits of LoHalo/NoHalo and found that they performed better than Sinc/lanzos (which was recommended only because it was better than the available alternatives in 2.8).
I am a professional image analyst. LoHalo and NoHalo are terrible in comparison to Sinc/Lanczos. Period. I need to find another way to downsample my (scientific) images now. In what manner are they similar?
I just upgraded 2.8 to 2.10 to get handle transform. But the **Halo methods look totally blurry for the same image types, same scaling. Very large downsample... like 10:1.