10-31-2021, 05:00 PM
This is wonderful, fellows !
As to your correctly noted "different scales", and "total coincidence", and absence of "hair combing" –
– – –
In the meantime, I'll be examining your replies in detail, and upping my Gimp Game [histogram analysis, channel manipulation, multi-window views, etc.]
As to your correctly noted "different scales", and "total coincidence", and absence of "hair combing" –
- Scales differed from hastily slapping together the specimens; here corrected.
- If I'm not mistaken, the total coincidence may be explained by the fact that both specimens are spatially coincident. That is to say, the "Ghost Processor" [happy Hallowe'en] leaves each pixel sitting exactly where it was, and always acts its mischief [yet to be precisely defined] the same way, on each channel ? I've observed the effect on numerous images. No matter what the subject [landscape, living room, child at play, electron micrograph, human MRI, flower bouquet], my initial assumption was always, "Oh, that there looks like it was overexposed by one F-stop." Hence my initial stab at simply knocking down the brightness.
- 10 Forum - Registration Checker 423.72 x 199.04 pt.tiff
- 10 Forum - GHOSTED Registration Checker 423.72 x 199.04 pt.tiff
– – –
In the meantime, I'll be examining your replies in detail, and upping my Gimp Game [histogram analysis, channel manipulation, multi-window views, etc.]