I used the same .xcf to generate both animations.
After applying the scroll-layer + interleave layers and generating the animation
01 (Gimp 2.10.12), I opened the .xcf in Gimp 2.10.18, deleted the layers created with the scroll-layers in gimp 2.10.12 and created new layers this time using the scroll-layer with gimp 2.10.18 and then applying the interleave layers.
In common both versions had two initial layers:
001 copy
Base
ScrollLayerReady.xcf (Size: 670.03 KB / Downloads: 239)
- Scroll-layer With 2.10.12
ScrollLayerReady21018.xcf (Size: 669.98 KB / Downloads: 235)
- Scroll-layer With 2.10.18
(05-04-2020, 08:59 PM)Ofnuts Wrote: Taking both pictures, exporting all layers as TGA (PNG includes a timestamp so identical images would produce different files), then taking the MD5 of each file for easy comparison:
So you have several clusters of files where the image is the same which is why you have this choppy animation. To be accurate you have two 5-frames breaks:
- 14-15-16-17-18
- 29-30-01-02-03
They are spaced exactly 15 frames apart...
And of course, I find these identical frames in the pre-animation version your posted. But I still have a very hard time believing that this would be due to the version of Gimp... Do you have the same problem with different steps (-4,-5,-6,-12)?
Sorry, I don't understand what steps that would be (-4, -5, -6, -12).
(
Some minutes after...)
Oops ... do you say steps in the scroll-layer script? (horizontal and vertical)
I haven't touched it again for maybe 10 days, but vaguely I remember that I tried several steps and usually always gave this problem, but I have a vague reminder that when the number of layers was quite large I didn't notice the oscillation (dysrhythmia / jumping ) in the animation.