G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - Printable Version +- Gimp-Forum.net (https://www.gimp-forum.net) +-- Forum: GIMP (https://www.gimp-forum.net/Forum-GIMP) +--- Forum: General questions (https://www.gimp-forum.net/Forum-General-questions) +--- Thread: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? (/Thread-G-Mic-Qt-shaperelevant) Pages:
1
2
|
G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - denzjos - 06-26-2023 I can not find shaperelevant in the G'Mic-Qt gimp plugin. Any suggestion? [attachment=9987] RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - rich2005 - 06-26-2023 Well, that took a surprising long time to end up with a "so simple" result. For the command line gmic, the command you posted works, except it looks like nothing happens. The blend image needs to be quite extreme to show a result. When it comes to Gimp, using the latest gimp_gmic_qt 3.2.6 there is no listed filter that I can see, some with shapeprevalent in their name but not the same as the command. Try using the command directly: Various -> Custom Code where it is a single line blend shapeprevalent (make sure you get the spelling correct) [attachment=9988] RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - denzjos - 06-27-2023 Rich, thanks for the reply. My first try give an error, but I'll give it another try this evening. RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - PixLab - 06-27-2023 (06-26-2023, 03:55 PM)denzjos Wrote: I can not find shaperelevant in the G'Mic-Qt gimp plugin. Any suggestion? On the 15 anniversary page of G'MIC, it is not a filter G'MIC Wrote:and a new layer blending mode for the blend command: shapeprevalent Thus you have to use it with the command line as rich2005 explained, or create a filter RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - denzjos - 06-27-2023 (06-27-2023, 08:57 AM)PixLab Wrote:I tried it as Rich mentioned (by the way, a nice explanation from Rich) Did you try it? Did you have any result? Example(s)?(06-26-2023, 03:55 PM)denzjos Wrote: I can not find shaperelevant in the G'Mic-Qt gimp plugin. Any suggestion? RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - rich2005 - 06-27-2023 @denzjos Not much in the gmic_reference.pdf, just a mention on page 86 It is picky about the reference image, too fine a pattern and it looks like nothing is happening. That had me fooled for some time. Too large a pattern and the source image is wiped out. Another example: 40 seconds worth https://i.imgur.com/rhATina.mp4 RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - denzjos - 06-27-2023 Rich, thanks for the effort, but I still get an error (even with the G'Mic-Qt example) : [attachment=9994] RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - rich2005 - 06-27-2023 spelling spelling spelling .... [attachment=9995] RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - denzjos - 06-27-2023 , dyslexia, weird, but it sometimes happens to me. By the way, after correcting the code : [attachment=9998] Rich, I don't think there is more effort needed to solve this problem. The result (your example) is not as spectacular as seen in the G'Mic-Qt example. I was expecting something else. So, thank you for the effort. RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - rich2005 - 06-27-2023 I think you should update your version of the gimp_gmic_qt plugin. Your version 3.1.5 is now quite old. |