ofn-brush-strokes-on-path - Printable Version +- Gimp-Forum.net (https://www.gimp-forum.net) +-- Forum: GIMP (https://www.gimp-forum.net/Forum-GIMP) +--- Forum: Extending the GIMP (https://www.gimp-forum.net/Forum-Extending-the-GIMP) +--- Thread: ofn-brush-strokes-on-path (/Thread-ofn-brush-strokes-on-path) |
RE: ofn-brush-strokes-on-path - carmen - 03-26-2020 (03-26-2020, 08:17 AM)Ofnuts Wrote: What you want is more like what my own text-along-path does: each character is rotated without distortion. That script could be a solution if:* Yes--I should have said 'ofn-text-along-path' instead of just 'text along path' (I use the Gimp default very sparingly: chiefly for 'forced oblique') * I haven't found a font in windows with a footprint: ¿is one there, Gimp-compatible? (Gimp balks at 'all icons' fonts) Just looked up unicde reference for emojis at W3 Schools, and ... no feet. So, the answer is - stick to brushes, or - go to inkscape? RE: ofn-brush-strokes-on-path - Ofnuts - 03-26-2020 (03-26-2020, 12:18 PM)carmen Wrote:(03-26-2020, 08:17 AM)Ofnuts Wrote: What you want is more like what my own text-along-path does: each character is rotated without distortion. That script could be a solution if:* Yes--I should have said 'ofn-text-along-path' instead of just 'text along path' (I use the Gimp default very sparingly: chiefly for 'forced oblique') "Footprints" is a standard emoji, with an assigned Unicode position. You should have it in your default font, especially if you see something here: ->?<- (yes this is a plain character, not a pasted image). This said, for other reasons it is unusable, because it is not just an outline, and the orientation is wrong. RE: ofn-brush-strokes-on-path - carmen - 03-26-2020 (03-26-2020, 12:18 PM)Ofnuts Wrote:(03-26-2020, 09:56 AM)Blighty Wrote: I have just been playing with this plug-in. It is easy to set Strokes in multiples of 10 by clicking on the slider bar, but extremely difficult to change from, for example, 10 to 12. Other than that works well, a useful plug-in. Also noticing the difficulty: personally, I would prefer numbers... RE: ofn-brush-strokes-on-path - Ofnuts - 03-27-2020 A intermediate solution is to use a spinner, see attached examples script (Test>Test numbers). What do you think? RE: ofn-brush-strokes-on-path - carmen - 03-27-2020 Just tested: for me (and my mouse) either stepped option works fine--more usable than the one in ofn-brush-strokes. RE: ofn-brush-strokes-on-path - Ofnuts - 03-27-2020 OK, updated a new version with spinners instead of sliders. Enjoy. RE: ofn-brush-strokes-on-path - Blighty - 03-27-2020 (03-26-2020, 01:14 AM)carmen Wrote: Trying this (brush: clipboard from imported svg) If you want footprints, try this brush. Standard Gimp, no plug-ins required. RE: ofn-brush-strokes-on-path - carmen - 03-27-2020 Many thanks! RE: ofn-brush-strokes-on-path - Krikor - 03-27-2020 I tested brush footprints_01 with the Ofnuts script (brush strokes on path), but nothing happens. I thought it was because of the .gih type, but then I tested other .gih brushes and they all worked with the script. Why in particular does this FootPrints_01_small brush produce nothing when executing the script? RE: ofn-brush-strokes-on-path - carmen - 03-27-2020 (03-27-2020, 04:04 PM)Krikor Wrote: I tested brush footprints_01 with the Ofnuts script (brush strokes on path), but nothing happens. I thought it was because of the .gih type, but then I tested other .gih brushes and they all worked with the script. Same snag here. Maybe due to: Using manually the brush, * it paints if the brush is dragged * it doesn't pint if it's clicked--sparks, for example, paints both on clicking the brush and on using the plug-in * normally stroking the path with the brush + emulate brush dinamics works, semi-transparent. Issue with the brush dinamics??!! |