Re: batch processing on bulk layer - Printable Version +- Gimp-Forum.net (https://www.gimp-forum.net) +-- Forum: GIMP (https://www.gimp-forum.net/Forum-GIMP) +--- Forum: General questions (https://www.gimp-forum.net/Forum-General-questions) +--- Thread: Re: batch processing on bulk layer (/Thread-Re-batch-processing-on-bulk-layer) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Re: batch processing on bulk layer - PixLab - 06-13-2022 (06-13-2022, 01:57 AM)Stephen Liu Wrote: Now I have changed my decision, scanning past photos on smartphoto instead of their film negatives. It'll save me lot of time. The quality of the digital photos is quite good. No post-editing is required. Please refers to attached photos captured by me in the past in Linz, Austria, no macros, only 1x1 Not only you are using day light instead of an artificial controlled light, but 1 corner is not leveled [attachment=8103] I won't speak about changing your mind so often, but in my opinion, if you had taken 1 way to do it and did stick to it from the beginning, you would have finished to scan them all and may be already post processed individually (no bulk processing) a part of them as you already got some good tips from your first post, this set up was already proposed weeks ago, I just hope you won't change again... RE: Re: batch processing on bulk layer - Stephen Liu - 06-13-2022 (06-13-2022, 03:28 AM)PixLab Wrote:Thanks for your advice and comment. Sorry for about that.(06-13-2022, 01:57 AM)Stephen Liu Wrote: Now I have changed my decision, scanning past photos on smartphoto instead of their film negatives. It'll save me lot of time. The quality of the digital photos is quite good. No post-editing is required. Please refers to attached photos captured by me in the past in Linz, Austria, no macros, only 1x1 This is my first time converting about 1,000 photos to digital files. I don't expect going the wrong way, investigating all routes suitable for my application. I need to care their future use, storage etc. If selecting a wrong way, to do the second time would take a lengthy time. Furthermore I can use LED light illumination. I'll test it again to check the quality of the output image Regards RE: Re: batch processing on bulk layer - PixLab - 06-13-2022 (06-13-2022, 07:30 AM)Stephen Liu Wrote: Furthermore I can use LED light illumination. I'll test it again to check the quality of the output image Put a light diffuser in front of the led, as it might be too harsh depending the power of your led, a simple white paper like an A4 or US letter paper for printer and some tape can do the job without investing money and if not enough, put 2 layers of papers with a centimeter in between RE: Re: batch processing on bulk layer - Stephen Liu - 06-13-2022 (06-13-2022, 08:01 AM)PixLab Wrote:Thanks.(06-13-2022, 07:30 AM)Stephen Liu Wrote: Furthermore I can use LED light illumination. I'll test it again to check the quality of the output image In alternative I can use my Samsung Galaxy Tablet as light source. In the past when I scanned film negatives with Samsung Galaxy Tablet as light box, it never made me disappointed RE: Re: batch processing on bulk layer - rich2005 - 06-13-2022 @Stephen Liu Quote:Now I have changed my decision, scanning past photos on smartphoto instead of their film negatives. It'll save me lot of time. Probably a good decision. In 20 years of using Gimp I have never had the need to use the Gimp batch command line and the horrible script-fu language. ImageMagick / XnView / more recently BIMP are the way I go. |