Is there a way to speed this up? Tile matching - Printable Version +- Gimp-Forum.net (https://www.gimp-forum.net) +-- Forum: GIMP (https://www.gimp-forum.net/Forum-GIMP) +--- Forum: General questions (https://www.gimp-forum.net/Forum-General-questions) +--- Thread: Is there a way to speed this up? Tile matching (/Thread-Is-there-a-way-to-speed-this-up-Tile-matching) |
Is there a way to speed this up? Tile matching - trandoductin - 01-18-2018 description of what i am trying to do So I have a script right now it's doing this loop through source image for each tile, copy and paste as pattern (difference mode) over top of tile image. loop through each tile of a visible copy and look at r,g,b using make selection of the tile. Code: r, _, _, _, _, _ = pdb.gimp_histogram(comp_layer,HISTOGRAM_RED,0,255) and then compose an image using those best match tiles... what's taking along time right now is this process of selecting the tile and using gimp_histogram... Is there anyway i could possibly speed this up? I can't think of one. RE: Is there a way to speed this up? Tile matching - Ofnuts - 01-19-2018 If you do Filter>Blur>Pixellize you get tiles where the R, G, B channels are the average for the tile (so the same as the values you get from the histogram calls). If you Color>Desaturate that using the "Average" method the gray you obtain is therefore (R+G+B)/3 from which you can obtain R+G+B (if needed) (although it could be better to use the Luminosity, which at that point shouldn't be harder to work with). RE: Is there a way to speed this up? Tile matching - trandoductin - 01-19-2018 Genius...I'll give it a shot and see if it's faster. Thanks! After bluring the whole result, and use get pixel to get values instead of histogram. It runs just over little 50% I am guessing 60% of the time previously so that's a major improvement. Actually it made huge improvements I took out all the debug and it's now like less than a second a tile instead of 8 seconds...wow. |