12-31-2020, 06:18 PM
Sorry for being unclear. If you have ofn_path_edits installed, on right click on the path in your attachment, you can choose 'Path Summary', which shows:
Then, looking in the documentation (or in the 'Guide to Ofnuts Paths' 
) you see that the 3 after <- means that there are 3 anchors in the path--one too many. As there appear only 2 in sight, one must be duplicated, and as the trouble was in the bottom arrowhead, that anchor is the most likely suspect. Ctrl+Shift+clik on an anchor with the path tool deletes that anchor, and as there are still 2 anchors in sight and the path shows no visible changes, the anchor was duplicated indeed. For good measure, you can run Path Summary again:
Now, 2 instead of 3: q.e.d. A run of Paths Arrowheads gives further proof, if needed: 
I hope to have made my previous meaning clear, now.
Misquoting Alice (or rather, the pedantic Red Queen) the moral of this is: no need to mess the previous work--just use the tools.
I still wonder how you got those wrong arrow-heads: our settings seem identical. Maybe a small edit to the path before saving...
Code:
Path "anchor arrow" [1]:
(84.3, 58.3) <- 3 : 27.4 : OPN -> (85.5, 33.7) ) you see that the 3 after <- means that there are 3 anchors in the path--one too many. As there appear only 2 in sight, one must be duplicated, and as the trouble was in the bottom arrowhead, that anchor is the most likely suspect. Ctrl+Shift+clik on an anchor with the path tool deletes that anchor, and as there are still 2 anchors in sight and the path shows no visible changes, the anchor was duplicated indeed. For good measure, you can run Path Summary again: Code:
Path "anchor arrow" [1]:
(84.3, 58.3) <- 2 : 27.4 : OPN -> (85.5, 33.7) I hope to have made my previous meaning clear, now.
Misquoting Alice (or rather, the pedantic Red Queen) the moral of this is: no need to mess the previous work--just use the tools.
I still wonder how you got those wrong arrow-heads: our settings seem identical. Maybe a small edit to the path before saving...