I guess that I should just be thankful to have working copies in both my W64 and Linux 32 working environments (the latter of which I am especially beholding to you).
But it just tickled me the way you said "for the n-th time" and it's true.... I see questions here about resynth over and over again.
And, I'd hate to think about having to work without it. There are other means, (clone/smudge etc) but in the 95% of the time where it works flawlessly, it's pretty close to a point and click solution. So it's kind of surprising that the gimp devs have not incorporated similar functionality, into the basic package.
FWIW, as far as my "orphaned" comment, I thought when we discussed some time ago how modern distributions of Linux had dropped python 2 support...I asked if there might be a python 3 compatible update in store for resynthesizer...and I thought someone said that the original developer had gone MIA or similar...
Of course that's no longer a specific need for me personally, that's just where my "orphaned" comment stems from.
But it just tickled me the way you said "for the n-th time" and it's true.... I see questions here about resynth over and over again.
And, I'd hate to think about having to work without it. There are other means, (clone/smudge etc) but in the 95% of the time where it works flawlessly, it's pretty close to a point and click solution. So it's kind of surprising that the gimp devs have not incorporated similar functionality, into the basic package.
FWIW, as far as my "orphaned" comment, I thought when we discussed some time ago how modern distributions of Linux had dropped python 2 support...I asked if there might be a python 3 compatible update in store for resynthesizer...and I thought someone said that the original developer had gone MIA or similar...
Of course that's no longer a specific need for me personally, that's just where my "orphaned" comment stems from.