Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"paper cut" authentication
#3
(08-24-2017, 06:57 AM)rich2005 Wrote: Welcome to gimp-forum.net

I do not know 'papercut' except what I just looked up - printer management & tracking to discourage you printing off 1000's of your own posters Wink

You are using OSX. Are you trying to print directly from Gimp ie. File -> Print or is some sort of drag-n-wish, a file into some sort of icon to sent to the printer.

Quote:Q1. Is it the file type and Paper Cut doesn't know what to do with it?

I think you have that spot on. Gimps own .xcf format is very much a 'your-work-in-progress' format aimed at preventing loss of work. All layers are saved as well as masks, paths, guides etc. Very few applications will even view a .xcf file.

Quote:Q2. Is there any print resolution advantage in printing directly from Gimp instead of .png?


There is no advantage either way except convenience. In linux I print straight from Gimp using the gutenprint plugin. The printer is set up as a postscript device. So it is not .xcf, png or tiff being sent.

I could export to a png, jpg or tiff. Then use some other application (PaperCut?) to print.
Which format to use. a png file is lossless, it is one layer, the same as a flattened .xcf file.

(09-16-2017, 11:50 AM)RobMW Wrote:
(08-24-2017, 06:57 AM)rich2005 Wrote: Welcome to gimp-forum.net

I do not know 'papercut' except what I just looked up - printer management & tracking to discourage you printing off 1000's of your own posters Wink

You are using OSX. Are you trying to print directly from Gimp ie. File -> Print or is some sort of drag-n-wish, a file into some sort of icon to sent to the printer.

Quote:Q1. Is it the file type and Paper Cut doesn't know what to do with it?

I think you have that spot on. Gimps own .xcf format is very much a 'your-work-in-progress' format aimed at preventing loss of work. All layers are saved as well as masks, paths, guides etc. Very few applications will even view a .xcf file.

Quote:Q2. Is there any print resolution advantage in printing directly from Gimp instead of .png?


There is no advantage either way except convenience. In linux I print straight from Gimp using the gutenprint plugin. The printer is set up as a postscript device. So it is not .xcf, png or tiff being sent.

I could export to a png, jpg or tiff. Then use some other application (PaperCut?) to print.
Which format to use. a png file is lossless, it is one layer, the same as a flattened .xcf file.

Thanks for your reply Rich.
I have used plan B, print to a non-papercut controlled network printer and it worked fine directly from GIMP.
Cheers
Rob
Reply


Messages In This Thread
"paper cut" authentication - by RobMW - 08-24-2017, 01:18 AM
RE: "paper cut" authentication - by rich2005 - 08-24-2017, 06:57 AM
RE: "paper cut" authentication - by RobMW - 09-16-2017, 11:50 AM

Forum Jump: