02-28-2023, 08:58 AM
(02-27-2023, 02:26 AM)PixLab Wrote:(02-25-2023, 12:07 PM)rich2005 Wrote: Looking at alternatives that are not too picky on image sizes.
Indeed too picky, quite unfriendly
That's terrible, after few guesses I gave up, by seeing this window too often in a row, I got a PTSD...
I came to hate this alert/window, same with the ofn-tiles or ofn-tile-thing
@Ofnuts, suggestion: let your script shred it or tile it, the last one will be what it will be, but we don't want to spend 5 minutes guessing or calculating what's the multiple of the image size, or at least your script should tell us what should be the image size to be a multiple of what we want to shred,
Or just shred without stopping the script > as in all cases the size of the last one will let us know on how much we need to "cut/shrink the image.... and people who are not picky with the last one not being the same size > will be happy as well, or will just delete it (I will).
Or add the necessary blank/transparent space on each side for the layer to become a multiple of the chosen number, then let shred it
Too many options.. Add on the left? On the right? Add transparency? Background color? Something else? The best way for the users to tell is to handle this themselves.
And frankly, those who use nearly prime numbers such as 51 and 1077 know exactly what they are doing and know what a multiple is (as do most people using Gimp.... the "multiple" is taught in 5th grade (students around 12yo) in France...)