06-27-2023, 07:38 PM


Rich, I don't think there is more effort needed to solve this problem. The result (your example) is not as spectacular as seen in the G'Mic-Qt example. I was expecting something else.
So, thank you for the effort.
G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ?
|
06-27-2023, 07:38 PM
![]() ![]() Rich, I don't think there is more effort needed to solve this problem. The result (your example) is not as spectacular as seen in the G'Mic-Qt example. I was expecting something else. So, thank you for the effort. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by denzjos - 06-26-2023, 03:55 PM
RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by rich2005 - 06-26-2023, 07:42 PM
RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by denzjos - 06-27-2023, 06:57 AM
RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by PixLab - 06-27-2023, 08:57 AM
RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by denzjos - 06-27-2023, 10:24 AM
RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by rich2005 - 06-27-2023, 10:52 AM
RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by denzjos - 06-27-2023, 06:34 PM
RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by rich2005 - 06-27-2023, 06:45 PM
RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by denzjos - 06-27-2023, 07:38 PM
RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by rich2005 - 06-27-2023, 07:46 PM
RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by denzjos - 06-28-2023, 06:58 AM
RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by Zero01 - 06-27-2023, 11:27 PM
RE: G'Mic-Qt shaperelevant ? - by PixLab - 06-28-2023, 04:01 AM
|