11-05-2023, 12:37 PM
Sorry to keep you busy.
36% is not a holy number to me. The idea is to find a way to be able to control the transparency in the best way between levels of opacities - which gradually merge into each other. That means having the best control and not leaving too much to chance
So it is:
- Out in a user-DEFINED edge area: Almost full transparency
- In a USER-DEFINED middle area where the opacity is at... let's stick with 36%
- and again a user-DEFINED solid area in the middle
The problem with the "Free Select" tool is that I don't really know where it starts to turn down the opacity. when I click delete
It could be good if it first started at the edge that I define with it
...
I don't answer right away - I have a son who nags about a game of chess and I can't very well ignore that
36% is not a holy number to me. The idea is to find a way to be able to control the transparency in the best way between levels of opacities - which gradually merge into each other. That means having the best control and not leaving too much to chance
So it is:
- Out in a user-DEFINED edge area: Almost full transparency
- In a USER-DEFINED middle area where the opacity is at... let's stick with 36%
- and again a user-DEFINED solid area in the middle
The problem with the "Free Select" tool is that I don't really know where it starts to turn down the opacity. when I click delete
It could be good if it first started at the edge that I define with it
...
I don't answer right away - I have a son who nags about a game of chess and I can't very well ignore that