Hi PixLab, there is probably not much difference between Gimp 2.10.34 and 2.10.36 ![[Image: smile.png]](https://www.gimp-forum.net/images/smilies/smile.png)
and maybe you will get some new hardware soon.
You said
On Xubuntu installing a gimp snap means plugins and scripts go in a sub folder under '$HOME/snap'.
With Firefox I type 'sudo apt install firefox'. It changes that to 'sudo snap install firefox' and copies your firefox profile from the .mozilla directory and puts it into another snap sub-dir. It also doesn't tell you what it did. That is supposed to be progress?
I think changing commands is unethical and they shouldn't do it.
For Gimp on Ubuntu-based distros we have an apt version, a flatpak, a snap and appimages. Canonical seem to be publishing both apt and snap versions of Gimp for 24.04 and it looks like they are not supporting the Gimp-developed flatpak. (or flatpaks generally)
If anyone likes using firefox from an AppImage I now use an 'esr' version from here.
and maybe you will get some new hardware soon.
You said
Quote:I hate snaps, thus my reticence to upgrade to 22.04
On Xubuntu installing a gimp snap means plugins and scripts go in a sub folder under '$HOME/snap'.
With Firefox I type 'sudo apt install firefox'. It changes that to 'sudo snap install firefox' and copies your firefox profile from the .mozilla directory and puts it into another snap sub-dir. It also doesn't tell you what it did. That is supposed to be progress?
I think changing commands is unethical and they shouldn't do it.
For Gimp on Ubuntu-based distros we have an apt version, a flatpak, a snap and appimages. Canonical seem to be publishing both apt and snap versions of Gimp for 24.04 and it looks like they are not supporting the Gimp-developed flatpak. (or flatpaks generally)
If anyone likes using firefox from an AppImage I now use an 'esr' version from here.