Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is layer Composite Space the wrong way round in GIMP?
#5
(Yesterday, 09:39 AM)Ofnuts Wrote:
(Yesterday, 01:16 AM)jez9999 Wrote:
(Yesterday, 12:16 AM)Ofnuts Wrote: (188,188,188) is actually the gray that is half as bright as white (ie, equivalent to a dense checkerboard pattern seen from afar).
In other words, you aren't taking in account the gamma encoding.

The trouble is, I'm exporting an alpha layer to a PNG and then applying that layer on top of another layer in a different piece of software (Imagesharp).  That software appears to do the style of compositing (linear?  perceptual?) that results in a 128,128,128 pixel, so I get a different image from that (darker) than from GIMP when I want to achieve the same image.  Is there a way I can get GIMP to output the alpha values such that when the other software blends the layer with a background layer it will result in the same output as GIMP?

Try using the "legacy" blend modes (ie Normal(l))

Yeah, I tried that.  Trouble is, I already have pixels in normal mode that I want to keep the same colour and switching to legacy darkens them.  I need to switch to legacy whilst keeping the colours the same.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Is layer Composite Space the wrong way round in GIMP? - by jez9999 - Yesterday, 02:22 PM

Forum Jump: