Posts: 1,527
Threads: 70
Joined: May 2021
Reputation:
167
Operating system(s):
Gimp version: 2.10
06-13-2022, 03:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2022, 04:46 AM by PixLab.)
(06-13-2022, 01:57 AM)Stephen Liu Wrote: Now I have changed my decision, scanning past photos on smartphoto instead of their film negatives. It'll save me lot of time. The quality of the digital photos is quite good. No post-editing is required. Please refers to attached photos captured by me in the past in Linz, Austria, no macros, only 1x1
The fixture is very simple. The plastic clips are for indexing. Please refers to attached photo
Cropping can't be avoided. Should I find those digital photos are of inferior quality then I'll scan their negatives.
Regards
Hi all,
I'm running remote desktop to shoot photos remotely.
My smartphone, Samsung Galaxy S9+, is connected to Ubuntu 20.04 desktop PC via an USB cable. It will charge the smartphone during capturing simultaneously.
I just remote-control the smartphone on Ubuntu 20.04 display and keyboard. After capturing, the digital file is immediately download to PC without saving on the smartphone.
This arrangement is very efficient without creating un-necessary motion to the smartphone during capturing because I don't need touching the screen of the smartphone.
Regards
Not only you are using day light instead of an artificial controlled light, but 1 corner is not leveled
I won't speak about changing your mind so often, but in my opinion, if you had taken 1 way to do it and did stick to it from the beginning, you would have finished to scan them all and may be already post processed individually (no bulk processing) a part of them as you already got some good tips from your first post, this set up was already proposed weeks ago, I just hope you won't change again...
Posts: 167
Threads: 26
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
2
Operating system(s):
Gimp version: 2.8
06-13-2022, 07:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2022, 07:34 AM by Stephen Liu.)
(06-13-2022, 03:28 AM)PixLab Wrote: (06-13-2022, 01:57 AM)Stephen Liu Wrote: Now I have changed my decision, scanning past photos on smartphoto instead of their film negatives. It'll save me lot of time. The quality of the digital photos is quite good. No post-editing is required. Please refers to attached photos captured by me in the past in Linz, Austria, no macros, only 1x1
The fixture is very simple. The plastic clips are for indexing. Please refers to attached photo
Cropping can't be avoided. Should I find those digital photos are of inferior quality then I'll scan their negatives.
Regards
Hi all,
I'm running remote desktop to shoot photos remotely.
My smartphone, Samsung Galaxy S9+, is connected to Ubuntu 20.04 desktop PC via an USB cable. It will charge the smartphone during capturing simultaneously.
I just remote-control the smartphone on Ubuntu 20.04 display and keyboard. After capturing, the digital file is immediately download to PC without saving on the smartphone.
This arrangement is very efficient without creating un-necessary motion to the smartphone during capturing because I don't need touching the screen of the smartphone.
Regards
Not only you are using day light instead of an artificial controlled light, but 1 corner is not leveled
I won't speak about changing your mind so often, but in my opinion, if you had taken 1 way to do it and did stick to it from the beginning, you would have finished to scan them all and may be already post processed individually (no bulk processing) a part of them as you already got some good tips from your first post, this set up was already proposed weeks ago, I just hope you won't change again...
Thanks for your advice and comment. Sorry for about that.
This is my first time converting about 1,000 photos to digital files. I don't expect going the wrong way, investigating all routes suitable for my application.
I need to care their future use, storage etc. If selecting a wrong way, to do the second time would take a lengthy time.
Furthermore I can use LED light illumination. I'll test it again to check the quality of the output image
Regards
Posts: 1,527
Threads: 70
Joined: May 2021
Reputation:
167
Operating system(s):
Gimp version: 2.10
06-13-2022, 08:01 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2022, 08:04 AM by PixLab.)
(06-13-2022, 07:30 AM)Stephen Liu Wrote: Furthermore I can use LED light illumination. I'll test it again to check the quality of the output image
Regards
Put a light diffuser in front of the led, as it might be too harsh depending the power of your led, a simple white paper like an A4 or US letter paper for printer and some tape can do the job without investing money and if not enough, put 2 layers of papers with a centimeter in between
Posts: 167
Threads: 26
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
2
Operating system(s):
Gimp version: 2.8
(06-13-2022, 08:01 AM)PixLab Wrote: (06-13-2022, 07:30 AM)Stephen Liu Wrote: Furthermore I can use LED light illumination. I'll test it again to check the quality of the output image
Regards
Put a light diffuser in front of the led, as it might be too harsh depending the power of your led, a simple white paper like an A4 or US letter paper for printer and some tape can do the job without investing money and if not enough, put 2 layers of papers with a centimeter in between
Thanks.
In alternative I can use my Samsung Galaxy Tablet as light source.
In the past when I scanned film negatives with Samsung Galaxy Tablet as light box, it never made me disappointed
Posts: 7,136
Threads: 155
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation:
1,006
Operating system(s):
Gimp version: 2.10
06-13-2022, 09:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2022, 09:28 AM by rich2005.)
@Stephen Liu
Quote:Now I have changed my decision, scanning past photos on smartphoto instead of their film negatives. It'll save me lot of time.
Probably a good decision. In 20 years of using Gimp I have never had the need to use the Gimp batch command line and the horrible script-fu language.
ImageMagick / XnView / more recently BIMP are the way I go.
|