Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,620
» Latest member: tapendra
» Forum threads: 7,174
» Forum posts: 39,198
Full Statistics
|
Latest Threads |
Some questions about brus...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: AlisonJones
51 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 12
|
Copy color effect to othe...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: rich2005
10 hours ago
» Replies: 5
» Views: 170
|
flowery cliff
Forum: Gallery
Last Post: MJ Barmish
Yesterday, 01:29 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 100
|
How can I run Flatpak ver...
Forum: Linux and other Unixen
Last Post: Ofnuts
02-18-2025, 11:27 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 128
|
Export all opened images ...
Forum: Extending the GIMP
Last Post: Krikor
02-18-2025, 09:18 PM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 4,996
|
Arrow Script
Forum: Extending the GIMP
Last Post: programmer_ceds
02-18-2025, 04:51 PM
» Replies: 122
» Views: 151,996
|
Turn photo negative to po...
Forum: Tutorials and tips
Last Post: programmer_ceds
02-18-2025, 11:11 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 12,112
|
multiple images on one pa...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: sallyanne
02-17-2025, 11:35 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 170
|
Problème de langage sur l...
Forum: Gimp-Forum.net
Last Post: Bart Simpson
02-17-2025, 07:04 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 127
|
Updating python plugins f...
Forum: Extending the GIMP
Last Post: rich2005
02-17-2025, 03:06 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 93
|
|
|
Best algorithm for resizing images? |
Posted by: ewfluder - 08-24-2020, 11:06 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (4)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/104b4/104b42e34424c3a58e02ed249cfd3cb3ff6e5f7d" alt="" |
I have some images saved, in the past I reduced the size of the images a lot to save disk space (for example, I reduced an image from 3840x2160 to 1280x720, that is, 200% reduction).
Now I need to go back to the original size, and well, that's a problem, because I kept these images for other people, and these people want the original image (they cannot suspect that the image quality has been reduced).
I know it is impossible to increase with the original quality, but what is the best algorithm to increase the size of images in Gimp to get as close to the original? To me, NoHalo looks the best, the others seem to blur the image.
There are some sites that promise to increase quality using AI for free, but what is the guarantee of privacy? I don't want private images stored or posted around. And it is very suspicious of a website doing this for free.
|
|
|
Having way too much fun with some upcoming script |
Posted by: Ofnuts - 08-24-2020, 03:39 PM - Forum: Gallery
- Replies (5)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63f7b/63f7ba8b0c53ad2285519e441f65dfda040717da" alt="" |
Not that easy to code, but the results are worth it:
Is it me or in the second image there is an illusion that the image has two levels, one in front with orange, red, and dark blue and one in the back with pale blue, green and yellow?
|
|
|
Selection -- Layer -- Manipulation |
Posted by: TRU - 08-23-2020, 05:56 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (2)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/104b4/104b42e34424c3a58e02ed249cfd3cb3ff6e5f7d" alt="" |
This seems so simple, and it should be.
It's not.
Once again, I have created an (irregular) selection in Gimp. [[It is not a square, or circle, or rectangle, or anything 'easy' to work with.]] I cut it out with the free-select scissors. I have the 'marching ants' to confirm that I completed the selection.
Once more, I have copied the selection (both Ctrl+C, and from the Edit menu). Once more, I have attempted to paste the selection into a new layer. Once more I have created the Floating Selection. Once more, I have attempted to anchor the Floating Selection into a new layer.
It simply does not work.
I've seen and read maybe a dozen tutorials on this. I have followed to the letter the steps illustrated or described in the tutorials, over and over.
I always wind up with one of two results:
(1) An 'empty' selection in the new layer -- the 'marching ants' outline is there, but the content inside them is not. Or,
(2) A visible selection which cannot be operated upon, or moved, or manipulated in any way.
Is it possible for someone, anyone to provide ONE (or two) method, which will (1) successfully paste the selection onto a new layer, and (2) allow me to work on that selection in the new layer? Something that will work at least 80% of the time?
If I sound frustrated, it is because I am. I apologize if that comes through.
I'm merely seeking something that works, and something that is (mainly) reliable.
I thank everyone in advance for their answers, and for their patience with me. It is appreciated.
-- Tyler Rupp
|
|
|
gimp crash |
Posted by: killum - 08-22-2020, 06:44 PM - Forum: Linux and other Unixen
- Replies (1)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/104b4/104b42e34424c3a58e02ed249cfd3cb3ff6e5f7d" alt="" |
gimp give me this log file after many crash
GNU Image Manipulation Program version 2.10.8
git-describe: GIMP_2_10_6-294-ga967e8d2c2
C compiler:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 8.2.0-13' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-8/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-8 --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-libmpx --enable-plugin --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib --with-target-system-zlib --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib --with-tune=generic --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --without-cuda-driver --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.2.0 (Debian 8.2.0-13)
using GEGL version 0.4.12 (compiled against version 0.4.12)
using GLib version 2.58.3 (compiled against version 2.58.1)
using GdkPixbuf version 2.38.1 (compiled against version 2.38.0)
using GTK+ version 2.24.32 (compiled against version 2.24.32)
using Pango version 1.42.3 (compiled against version 1.42.3)
using Fontconfig version 2.13.1 (compiled against version 2.13.1)
using Cairo version 1.16.0 (compiled against version 1.16.0)
> fatal error: Aborted
Stack trace:
/lib/libgimpbase-2.0.so.0(gimp_stack_trace_print+0x397)[0x7fc8fc031e27]
gimp(+0xd14a0)[0x564a15aa74a0]
gimp(+0xd18d8)[0x564a15aa78d8]
gimp(+0xd2037)[0x564a15aa8037]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x12730)[0x7fc8fb339730]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x10b)[0x7fc8fb19b7bb]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(abort+0x121)[0x7fc8fb186535]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x2240f)[0x7fc8fb18640f]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x30102)[0x7fc8fb194102]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(+0x436bb)[0x7fc8fb0606bb]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(+0x43760)[0x7fc8fb060760]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(_XEventsQueued+0x5d)[0x7fc8fb060a5d]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(XPending+0x57)[0x7fc8fb0527b7]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0(+0x588d5)[0x7fc8fc0f28d5]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_context_check+0x1d1)[0x7fc8fb51db11]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(+0x4e0e0)[0x7fc8fb51e0e0]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_loop_run+0xb2)[0x7fc8fb51e4c2]
gimp(app_run+0x357)[0x564a15aa6cb7]
gimp(main+0x395)[0x564a15aa65b5]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xeb)[0x7fc8fb18809b]
gimp(_start+0x2a)[0x564a15aa673a]
|
|
|
Scaling Image feature snafu |
Posted by: CRP777 - 08-21-2020, 01:11 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (1)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/104b4/104b42e34424c3a58e02ed249cfd3cb3ff6e5f7d" alt="" |
I've scaled images in GIMP 2.10 and imported them into an Internet Webdesign program called BandZoogle without any problems before.
I just received an image from a graphic designer that I need to scale down and the scale feature works in GIMP but does not transfer properly. In other words, the image remains the original size once it's imported into BandZoogle.
What am I missing?
|
|
|
|