| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Latest Threads |
Problem with exporting fr...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: rich2005
Today, 07:16 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 182
|
Triptych - Abandoned Gate...
Forum: Gallery
Last Post: Tas_mania
Today, 06:39 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 133
|
strange and crazy, Hamste...
Forum: Watercooler
Last Post: denzjos
Yesterday, 06:27 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 101
|
How would I be able to be...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: BrokenGamerX
06-29-2026, 11:31 PM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 508
|
How to iterate pixels wit...
Forum: Scripting questions
Last Post: Scallact
06-29-2026, 12:17 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 120
|
What's the Best Way to Ch...
Forum: Other graphics software
Last Post: rich2005
06-29-2026, 09:25 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 145
|
How to restore tool docks...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: sallyanne
06-29-2026, 01:48 AM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 1,122
|
Arrow Script
Forum: Extending the GIMP
Last Post: programmer_ceds
06-28-2026, 05:17 PM
» Replies: 135
» Views: 272,250
|
Gimp 3.2.4 tool options d...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: rich2005
06-28-2026, 10:21 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 188
|
Linux LMDE changing defau...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: Green Pig
06-27-2026, 01:13 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 234
|
|
|
| I need it to be opaque |
|
Posted by: anemul - 03-15-2026, 05:41 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Hello all. I enjoy RC racing. I need to make some number decals. When I make them in GIMP 3.08 revision 2 and print the images onto transparent decals, the graphics are way too transparent. I'm not sure what information you need, so here is the basic:
Windows 11
GIMP 3.08 revision 2
I have an older Epson 837
At this point I have spent more on decal paper than I would have if I had had someone make them for me. That's limited, though. Any ideas?
|
|
|
| can I do these Photoshop actions in GIMP 3.0.4? |
|
Posted by: drkenrich - 03-10-2026, 09:51 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (1)
|
 |
I've used Adobe CS6 full suite since it came out. Now I'm old and do very little. For what little I do now, I think GIMP will work for me.
However, there are two PS processes I still need. Hopefully, one of you can tell me how GIMP can do them.
1. I take hundreds of photos when I travel. I use PS Photomerge to combine multiple close overlapping shots to create a single large image.
2. I have a script that takes the file name and overlays it on the lower portion of the image so it's a visible title as it's run through slideshows.
I'd love to transition to GIMP if it can do these two things.
|
|
|
| migrating 2.8 bash scripts to gimp 3 |
|
Posted by: vince - 03-09-2026, 11:53 AM - Forum: Scripting questions
- Replies (10)
|
 |
Hello,
new to this forum I hope someone here could help me a little bit.
As I upgraded from debian 12 to debian 13, gimp was upgraded to version 3.
I have a set of short scripts that allowed me to invoke gimp (at least until version 2.8) from a linux bash console. Now they fail, so I have to adapt them to recent changes.
The one question I still stumble on is the ability to set a drawable in my image. The former syntax does not work anymore :
Code:
(drawable (car(gimp-image-get-active-drawable image)))
so that I can't do anything on a specific layer e.g. desaturate :
Code:
(gimp-drawable-desaturate drawable 0)
How can I instruct gimp that, let's say, the drawable is layer [0] ?
Thanks in advance,
Vince.
|
|
|
| script-fu help |
|
Posted by: egrivel - 03-08-2026, 07:43 PM - Forum: Extending the GIMP
- Replies (6)
|
 |
Hi, I have a script-fu script I wrote back in 2003, which I use to save the current image in the ../edited folder, and mark the image as "saved". I have been using this script in every version of Gimp since 2003 without changes, but when I tried to use it in Gimp 3.0 I got the error:
Execution error for 'DoIt':
Error: eval: unbound variable: gimp-image-get-filename
Does anybody know if the function gimp-image-get-filename has changed in Gimp 3.0, or if I'm missing something in my Gimp installation?
Thanks,
Eric
|
|
|
|