| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 4,978
» Latest member: JohnRL
» Forum threads: 7,723
» Forum posts: 41,990
Full Statistics
|
| Latest Threads |
Déformation par "Cage"
Forum: General questions
Last Post: rich2005
27 minutes ago
» Replies: 7
» Views: 285
|
GIMP 3.0.6 only uses a fe...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: MetalJack
Yesterday, 07:10 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 76
|
Average colour in GIMP - ...
Forum: Extending the GIMP
Last Post: Ofnuts
12-02-2025, 08:57 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 323
|
Plugins with Gimp 3.2 RC1...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: rich2005
12-02-2025, 08:10 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 173
|
Isse with applying Layer ...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: rich2005
12-02-2025, 08:21 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 159
|
Batcher - Batch Image Pro...
Forum: Extending the GIMP
Last Post: chuckhenrich
12-01-2025, 10:51 AM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 8,495
|
plugin-py3-export-all
Forum: Extending the GIMP
Last Post: Ofnuts
12-01-2025, 08:19 AM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 475
|
pencil don't have full co...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: rich2005
11-30-2025, 08:03 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 3,490
|
Pasting a layer group wit...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: teapot
11-29-2025, 04:06 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 285
|
Can the gradient tool be ...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: CmykStudent
11-28-2025, 01:14 PM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 474
|
|
|
| All my color blendings are tending towards brighter values in all images |
|
Posted by: Ellye - 01-27-2024, 05:03 AM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Suppose I have a pure black (#000000) layer and a pure white (#FFFFFF) layer.
They are one on top of the other, both with normal blending. The one above is 50% opacity.
I'd expect that the resulting color would be a midpoint gray (#7F7F7F). And I'm pretty sure that's what I used to get on GIMP until recently, and it's still what I get on other softwares.
Instead, I'm getting #BCBCBC - a far brighter color.
This is not just about layer blending either - any brush with some kind of transparency or anything like that - the result of mixing colors always come up brighter than I'd expect.
I tried both "Perceptual Gamma" and "Linear Light" modes, no change.
Video demonstrating (I compare with Paint.Net on it, but the result there is the same on any other software aside from GIMP - from Photoshop to html rendering in web browsers):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfAXikmC...e=youtu.be
|
|
|
| What happens to metadata in GIMP? |
|
Posted by: andreo - 01-26-2024, 06:55 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (5)
|
 |
I was wondering what happens to metadata in Gimp. I was having fun playing with some programming languages to create an image editor. I understand that in broad terms the structure is this:
I have a .jpg photo that I want to edit, I upload it to the editor, the editor generally uses an external library to read the .jpg file; it takes this file, decompresses it, isolates the bits relating to the actual image which will form an array of pixels of the exact dimensions of the image that will be shown on the screen.
At this point each editor will have its own functionality for editing the photo.
Once you have achieved the desired result you can export the photo again as .jpg. The edited pixel array is taken and compressed again into a .jpg file via an external library.
I wanted to understand what happens to the metadata in this process in Gimp. I tried to read the Gimp source code but I didn't understand.
I'm interested in understanding well what the final exported .jpg image is made of. If it is composed of the compressed pixel array of the edited image + some metadata created by Gimp useful for the final file (Such as resolution and size) + any metadata from the original file that Gimp recognizes and copies into the new one (Asking you during export if you want to keep them or not and allowing you to modify them).
Or could it happen that Gimp adds metadata present in the original photo to the final .jpg but does not recognize it and does not show it in the metadata viewer or editor?
If anyone knows any places within the Gimp code where I can understand this, it would be very useful for me.
|
|
|
| Copying and pasting from the Internet |
|
Posted by: alano9999 - 01-26-2024, 05:26 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (5)
|
 |
I have a background layer and I want to paste a transparent image to it. I.E I do a Google image search for ‘trees transparent’ and receive a full page of results. However when I select a result with a checkered background vs an image with a white background. Only the ones with the white background copy and paste correctly. The ones with the initial visible checkered background do not. (Pasted image also includes the background with these). I was wondering why..
|
|
|
| Klone Tool |
|
Posted by: helmut.regenfuss@t-online.de - 01-25-2024, 04:47 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Sorry, I'm a beginner in gimp.
I have a picture with white text on black background. First I want to remove the text. I try using the klone tool. I use the ctl-key for marking the source spot. But the klone tool does not do anything.
I would appreciate a help tip
|
|
|
| Animations and Layers editor |
|
Posted by: SeanRickard - 01-24-2024, 08:26 AM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (2)
|
 |
I'm new here, so hi.
After optimising for an animation, is there a way of exporting the list showing in the Layers Editor as a text fiile?
For Example:
----------------
img001.jpg(100ms)
img002.jpg(2000ms)
img003.jpg(200ms)
.... etc
cheers Sean.
|
|
|
| Why is the Move tool moving the wrong layer? |
|
Posted by: Ofnuts - 01-23-2024, 08:43 AM - Forum: Tutorials and tips
- No Replies
|
 |
By default, the Move tool auto-picks the layer of the top most-non transparent pixel where you click. So, starting with such an image:
Depending on where you click the Move tool will pick a different layer:
This can be disconcerting at times because if you click at random in text, you could be clicking on a transparent spot (for instance, inside the D or O above) and so selecting a layer below (the background or the green spot), which will make the move tool move that layer and not the text layer.
So, to move text, you have to click on the characters themselves (or on any opaque part of the layer, but this is what we are naturally doing most of the time for non-text layers).
In case of dire need, you can make the Move tool act on the active layer:
But instead of checking the tool option, you can also just start the drag with a shift-click. It is usually a bad idea to set the tool permanently in the Move active layer mode, because it makes arranging several layers very cumbersome.
Finally, remember that in the Text tool, you can move the layer you are editing by Alt-Control-drag (independently of where you click).
|
|
|
|