| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 4,995
» Latest member: scastle
» Forum threads: 7,733
» Forum posts: 42,033
Full Statistics
|
|
|
| What happens to metadata in GIMP? |
|
Posted by: andreo - 01-26-2024, 06:55 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (5)
|
 |
I was wondering what happens to metadata in Gimp. I was having fun playing with some programming languages to create an image editor. I understand that in broad terms the structure is this:
I have a .jpg photo that I want to edit, I upload it to the editor, the editor generally uses an external library to read the .jpg file; it takes this file, decompresses it, isolates the bits relating to the actual image which will form an array of pixels of the exact dimensions of the image that will be shown on the screen.
At this point each editor will have its own functionality for editing the photo.
Once you have achieved the desired result you can export the photo again as .jpg. The edited pixel array is taken and compressed again into a .jpg file via an external library.
I wanted to understand what happens to the metadata in this process in Gimp. I tried to read the Gimp source code but I didn't understand.
I'm interested in understanding well what the final exported .jpg image is made of. If it is composed of the compressed pixel array of the edited image + some metadata created by Gimp useful for the final file (Such as resolution and size) + any metadata from the original file that Gimp recognizes and copies into the new one (Asking you during export if you want to keep them or not and allowing you to modify them).
Or could it happen that Gimp adds metadata present in the original photo to the final .jpg but does not recognize it and does not show it in the metadata viewer or editor?
If anyone knows any places within the Gimp code where I can understand this, it would be very useful for me.
|
|
|
| Copying and pasting from the Internet |
|
Posted by: alano9999 - 01-26-2024, 05:26 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (5)
|
 |
I have a background layer and I want to paste a transparent image to it. I.E I do a Google image search for ‘trees transparent’ and receive a full page of results. However when I select a result with a checkered background vs an image with a white background. Only the ones with the white background copy and paste correctly. The ones with the initial visible checkered background do not. (Pasted image also includes the background with these). I was wondering why..
|
|
|
| Klone Tool |
|
Posted by: helmut.regenfuss@t-online.de - 01-25-2024, 04:47 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Sorry, I'm a beginner in gimp.
I have a picture with white text on black background. First I want to remove the text. I try using the klone tool. I use the ctl-key for marking the source spot. But the klone tool does not do anything.
I would appreciate a help tip
|
|
|
| Animations and Layers editor |
|
Posted by: SeanRickard - 01-24-2024, 08:26 AM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (2)
|
 |
I'm new here, so hi.
After optimising for an animation, is there a way of exporting the list showing in the Layers Editor as a text fiile?
For Example:
----------------
img001.jpg(100ms)
img002.jpg(2000ms)
img003.jpg(200ms)
.... etc
cheers Sean.
|
|
|
| Why is the Move tool moving the wrong layer? |
|
Posted by: Ofnuts - 01-23-2024, 08:43 AM - Forum: Tutorials and tips
- No Replies
|
 |
By default, the Move tool auto-picks the layer of the top most-non transparent pixel where you click. So, starting with such an image:
Depending on where you click the Move tool will pick a different layer:
This can be disconcerting at times because if you click at random in text, you could be clicking on a transparent spot (for instance, inside the D or O above) and so selecting a layer below (the background or the green spot), which will make the move tool move that layer and not the text layer.
So, to move text, you have to click on the characters themselves (or on any opaque part of the layer, but this is what we are naturally doing most of the time for non-text layers).
In case of dire need, you can make the Move tool act on the active layer:
But instead of checking the tool option, you can also just start the drag with a shift-click. It is usually a bad idea to set the tool permanently in the Move active layer mode, because it makes arranging several layers very cumbersome.
Finally, remember that in the Text tool, you can move the layer you are editing by Alt-Control-drag (independently of where you click).
|
|
|
|