Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
|
|
gimp window off screen |
Posted by: gm40 - 02-28-2022, 03:13 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Hi,
I'm running gimp 2.10.12 within opensuse leap 15.3. I do use a two-sreen mode on and off. When I open gimp now its window is not matching any of the two screens. I'm also not able to resize the window to match the screen. The handle for pulling down the top shows up but doesn't do anything. So the bottom margin of the window is somewhere below the screen(s). Any picture that I open in gimp is only partially visible. I've searched the configuration files to find a parameter I could adjust and then open gimp again but haven't had any luck so far. I suspect this is a bug as I can't remember having experienced the same problem with gimp 2.8.
Thanks for any hint!
|
|
|
moving a layer ? |
Posted by: abrogard - 02-28-2022, 07:35 AM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (3)
|
 |
I'm a bit lost here. gimp 2.10
I opened an image file.
I made a copy layer.
then I made another layer.
then I hid the first layer. the image file.
then I made active the top layer.
then I traced with the bush tool some feature from the underlying copy layer onto the top layer.
then I found with the move tool I could move the underlying layer all around the canvas, so that it was right off it if I liked.
But I can't move the top layer that I drew on at all.
what am I doing wrong?
|
|
|
Too good a camera |
Posted by: meetdilip - 02-27-2022, 11:46 AM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Hi, I took some pictures using a good camera ( mobile ). The camera is good enough to highlight all marks and skin texture. How do we touch up such a photo, mostly selfies using GIMP? Which tool to soften the skin a bit and possibly brighten too? Thanks.
|
|
|
Delete works different with different tools |
Posted by: biuro74 - 02-27-2022, 01:50 AM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Hi,
1. I've noticed something annoying - or maybe it's a special feature and it works as supposed ?
When I select some shape using a lasso tool, and use "Delete" key on that area, which is "edit-clear" function as I think, it erases an area with very nice edge antialiasing.
But when I select the same shape using a Magic Wand tool, and erase that area with "Delete" ley as well, edges are harsh, like in an old graphic editor which simply clears selected pixels.
This makes me very sick, as I do two-stage editing in majority of pictures: first stage is a shape select, reverse and background removal, then layer is being moved into another file... and I repeat that for few pictures. Second stage is detailing of all layers in new file, and here my problems begin - because what I have selected previously wasting many minutes, is not repeat-able as I don't want to double the time spent already for selecting area with lasso -> so I simply click MagicWand at background & select inverse. So easy, but erasing details give me sharp edges this time.
Do you know, how to make antialiased edges again ? I don't even think about feather, blur or similar options. How to clear selected area the same way, no matter with tool I use ? In both tools properties I've got "antialiasing" ticked on, I've got transparency (alpha channel).
2. Sometimes when I select some shape with lasso tool (usually when selecting comes over physical picture size - but Gimp shrinks selection automatically to picture size), click Layers->Transpareny->colour to alpha and use "Delete" key, some part of picture disappears. I've found a workaround to insert an alpha channel first, and then it all works fine. It's a bug for sure, where can I report it ?
Any clues appreciated.
Cheers
|
|
|
Perspective too lossy |
Posted by: Bohoho - 02-26-2022, 07:59 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (2)
|
 |
I'm a pure beginner. I just wanted to change perspective of part of bitmap image. I did, then I took a screenshot of the image and pasted it where I wanted it (in a different editor). I think it came out smaller dimensionally than it should have. Parts of it, that were supposed to be smooth curves or pretty straight lines were way too jagged. Any tips? Does Gimp use a lossier than necessary algorithm? Do I have to be sure to use the minimum number of perspective adjustments or are things calculated from the original image rather than the most recent lossy adjusted images?
|
|
|
|