| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 5,304
» Latest member: Jon
» Forum threads: 7,906
» Forum posts: 42,895
Full Statistics
|
| Latest Threads |
Why is the Move tool movi...
Forum: Tutorials and tips
Last Post: rich2005
Yesterday, 01:23 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 5,793
|
Welcome Screen Colour The...
Forum: Windows
Last Post: Jon
Yesterday, 12:42 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 103
|
Batcher - Batch Image Pro...
Forum: Extending the GIMP
Last Post: rich2005
05-24-2026, 04:24 PM
» Replies: 11
» Views: 17,493
|
arakne path shapes
Forum: Extending the GIMP
Last Post: rich2005
05-24-2026, 08:13 AM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 1,869
|
GIMP 3.2.x
Forum: General questions
Last Post: rich2005
05-24-2026, 07:43 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 382
|
question about "Batch Ima...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: vebe67
05-23-2026, 06:32 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 242
|
chemin - path
Forum: General questions
Last Post: ApacheBlue
05-22-2026, 02:13 PM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 608
|
All projects are LOCKED
Forum: General questions
Last Post: sallyanne
05-22-2026, 10:41 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 191
|
Setting a default directo...
Forum: Tutorials and tips
Last Post: merlilderman
05-21-2026, 02:57 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 2,225
|
Switch tools from Text to...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: Ulodesk
05-18-2026, 10:05 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 423
|
|
|
Best algorithm for resizing images? |
|
Posted by: ewfluder - 08-24-2020, 11:06 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (4)
|
 |
I have some images saved, in the past I reduced the size of the images a lot to save disk space (for example, I reduced an image from 3840x2160 to 1280x720, that is, 200% reduction).
Now I need to go back to the original size, and well, that's a problem, because I kept these images for other people, and these people want the original image (they cannot suspect that the image quality has been reduced).
I know it is impossible to increase with the original quality, but what is the best algorithm to increase the size of images in Gimp to get as close to the original? To me, NoHalo looks the best, the others seem to blur the image.
There are some sites that promise to increase quality using AI for free, but what is the guarantee of privacy? I don't want private images stored or posted around. And it is very suspicious of a website doing this for free.
|
|
|
| Having way too much fun with some upcoming script |
|
Posted by: Ofnuts - 08-24-2020, 03:39 PM - Forum: Gallery
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Not that easy to code, but the results are worth it:
Is it me or in the second image there is an illusion that the image has two levels, one in front with orange, red, and dark blue and one in the back with pale blue, green and yellow?
|
|
|
| Selection -- Layer -- Manipulation |
|
Posted by: TRU - 08-23-2020, 05:56 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (2)
|
 |
This seems so simple, and it should be.
It's not.
Once again, I have created an (irregular) selection in Gimp. [[It is not a square, or circle, or rectangle, or anything 'easy' to work with.]] I cut it out with the free-select scissors. I have the 'marching ants' to confirm that I completed the selection.
Once more, I have copied the selection (both Ctrl+C, and from the Edit menu). Once more, I have attempted to paste the selection into a new layer. Once more I have created the Floating Selection. Once more, I have attempted to anchor the Floating Selection into a new layer.
It simply does not work.
I've seen and read maybe a dozen tutorials on this. I have followed to the letter the steps illustrated or described in the tutorials, over and over.
I always wind up with one of two results:
(1) An 'empty' selection in the new layer -- the 'marching ants' outline is there, but the content inside them is not. Or,
(2) A visible selection which cannot be operated upon, or moved, or manipulated in any way.
Is it possible for someone, anyone to provide ONE (or two) method, which will (1) successfully paste the selection onto a new layer, and (2) allow me to work on that selection in the new layer? Something that will work at least 80% of the time?
If I sound frustrated, it is because I am. I apologize if that comes through.
I'm merely seeking something that works, and something that is (mainly) reliable.
I thank everyone in advance for their answers, and for their patience with me. It is appreciated.
-- Tyler Rupp
|
|
|
| gimp crash |
|
Posted by: killum - 08-22-2020, 06:44 PM - Forum: Linux and other Unixen
- Replies (1)
|
 |
gimp give me this log file after many crash
GNU Image Manipulation Program version 2.10.8
git-describe: GIMP_2_10_6-294-ga967e8d2c2
C compiler:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 8.2.0-13' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-8/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-8 --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-libmpx --enable-plugin --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib --with-target-system-zlib --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib --with-tune=generic --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --without-cuda-driver --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.2.0 (Debian 8.2.0-13)
using GEGL version 0.4.12 (compiled against version 0.4.12)
using GLib version 2.58.3 (compiled against version 2.58.1)
using GdkPixbuf version 2.38.1 (compiled against version 2.38.0)
using GTK+ version 2.24.32 (compiled against version 2.24.32)
using Pango version 1.42.3 (compiled against version 1.42.3)
using Fontconfig version 2.13.1 (compiled against version 2.13.1)
using Cairo version 1.16.0 (compiled against version 1.16.0)
> fatal error: Aborted
Stack trace:
/lib/libgimpbase-2.0.so.0(gimp_stack_trace_print+0x397)[0x7fc8fc031e27]
gimp(+0xd14a0)[0x564a15aa74a0]
gimp(+0xd18d8)[0x564a15aa78d8]
gimp(+0xd2037)[0x564a15aa8037]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x12730)[0x7fc8fb339730]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x10b)[0x7fc8fb19b7bb]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(abort+0x121)[0x7fc8fb186535]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x2240f)[0x7fc8fb18640f]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x30102)[0x7fc8fb194102]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(+0x436bb)[0x7fc8fb0606bb]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(+0x43760)[0x7fc8fb060760]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(_XEventsQueued+0x5d)[0x7fc8fb060a5d]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(XPending+0x57)[0x7fc8fb0527b7]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0(+0x588d5)[0x7fc8fc0f28d5]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_context_check+0x1d1)[0x7fc8fb51db11]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(+0x4e0e0)[0x7fc8fb51e0e0]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_loop_run+0xb2)[0x7fc8fb51e4c2]
gimp(app_run+0x357)[0x564a15aa6cb7]
gimp(main+0x395)[0x564a15aa65b5]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xeb)[0x7fc8fb18809b]
gimp(_start+0x2a)[0x564a15aa673a]
|
|
|
| Scaling Image feature snafu |
|
Posted by: CRP777 - 08-21-2020, 01:11 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (1)
|
 |
I've scaled images in GIMP 2.10 and imported them into an Internet Webdesign program called BandZoogle without any problems before.
I just received an image from a graphic designer that I need to scale down and the scale feature works in GIMP but does not transfer properly. In other words, the image remains the original size once it's imported into BandZoogle.
What am I missing?
|
|
|
| Gimp suddenly doesn't see my scanner |
|
Posted by: denno - 08-21-2020, 01:56 AM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (8)
|
 |
I've reinstalled the printer-scanner and connected it to the wifi again. Twice. Driver is up-to-date.
Canon mx490
Gimp still sees the printer, but not the scanner.
It was working fine yesterday. My wife's computer sees it.
My device manager now calls the printer-scanner "Unknown Device"
IDs it as a printer, locates it on the M490 series with a long number after it.
Says it is working properly.
Any help?
Thanks
|
|
|
|