| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
|
|
| Subtraction Technique - Forensic Imaging |
|
Posted by: dwarrington - 12-12-2018, 07:28 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Hello, I work in forensic science and am teaching a lab at a university using the subtraction method for footwear and fingerprints.
Effectively I have 2 photographs taken using a tripod and the same lighting and camera settings (I have JPEG and NEF files for both photographs)
- 1 is of a dusty partial footwear mark on a wooden floor
- 1 is of the wooden floor but with the footwear mark completely cleaned away after the first photograph
I want to subtract the background (cleaned substrate) from the photograph showing the footwear mark, leaving only the footwear mark which will hopefully reveal more detail that was visibly lost in the wood grain background. The background can often interfere with visualising the print, especially with fingerprints and so the removal of the background can reveal fine details in ridges, valleys and pores etc.
I have experience using the subtraction method in Photoshop but as this is a university course I am unable to get multiple licences due to funding etc and so I have started playing around with GIMP instead.
I have tried a few methods I found online loading the images as layers and playing around with the subtraction and difference modes with some success but was wondering if there were any other settings/changes I could use to improve this?
Also, is there an auto-align function in GIMP? e.g. solid lines between floorboards are aligned, not just the photographs themselves. As much as I try not to knock the tripod between photographs there sometimes can be very slight movement.
Thanks for your help/advice, David
|
|
|
| no printing with Canon MG5220 under Debian stable |
|
Posted by: ray andrews - 12-11-2018, 03:55 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Posted this on the dead forum (why is it still there if it's dead?):
I mentioned this a year ago, but the problem is still there so I thought I'd shake the bushes a bit: My Canon MG5220 printer doesn't work with GIMP. It works flawlessly with every other application I have on my Debian stable distro. As I've read elsewhere on the web, you do your modifications to an image in GIMP, then you save it and use another app to print it. Really?
The printer does nothing at all except that the little activity screen says that information is being received but nothing physical happens. It's exactly the same with Gutenprint or the 'normal' print. Can't this be fixed guys? Every other app prints to the Canon without any trouble. As it is, for simple work I'm now using fotoxx which prints fine, but I'd rather be using GIMP.
|
|
|
| GIMP version for older PC |
|
Posted by: elyman - 12-10-2018, 05:26 PM - Forum: Windows
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Hello,
I am trying to set GIMP up on an older 32 bit pc and it continually crashes.
It runs fine on my newer laptop.
Is there an older GIMP version that I can download that might run on the older machine.
Thank you
Neil
|
|
|
| Selection |
|
Posted by: FireyDeath4 - 12-08-2018, 04:48 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (3)
|
 |
God, I just wasted time all over again signing up for this.
http://gimpforums.com/thread-selection--57412
Just wondering if there's some way to make whatever of the selection that goes out the boundary come in the other side. From here I can see four potential ways of doing that:
1: There's already a tool that does that
2: Use a random tool that crops the selection to whatever's out the boundary for some reason
3: The long way. Which I'm doing right now. It's kinda difficult to get the accuracy without taking a while. I just cut part of the object, paste it on the other side, align it on the edge where I want, get the first piece, get it on the same position of the axis perpendicular to the edge the cut piece is on to the cut piece and put it on the other side. Oh, also, I can't get anything past the edge, or it's gone.
4: Use a feature that doesn't delete whatever's out the boundary once it's unselected, and then one that can select whatever is.
Mostly what makes stuff difficult is how complicated the selection tool is. If this was Microsoft Paint I could just do it super fast without worrying about all the controls. But basically it just takes a while anyway in general.
By the way if it wasn't obvious already, I want to do a tiling. Bye.
P.S. The reason I signed up was to make this post. So don't care about my user.
Oh, yeah, I'm gonna search the forums in case there's already an answer.
|
|
|
|